Understanding and fixing the "not wrapped in act(...)" Warning in React Testing

React is a powerful library for building user interfaces, and testing your components is essential to ensure they behave as expected. However, if you've spent time writing React tests, you might have encountered the infamous "not wrapped in act(...)" warning:

Warning: An update to <ComponentName> inside a test was not wrapped in act(...).

This warning is React's way of ensuring that state updates are tested in a predictable manner. If you're facing this issue, don't worry—this guide will explain what it means and how to resolve it.

Why Does This Warning Occur?

React Testing Library and similar tools use React's `act()` function to ensure that all updates (like state or DOM changes) are applied and tested together. If updates happen outside the scope of `act()`, React warns you because the test might not behave as expected.

For example, this warning often appears when:

A component performs an asynchronous update.
A test triggers updates to state or props without proper handling.

Steps to Fix the Warning

1. Wrap State Updates in `act()`

The simplest solution is to wrap any state updates or DOM changes in the `act()` function. Here’s an example:

Problematic Code:


import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react';
import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event';
import MyComponent from './MyComponent';

test('should update text on button click', () => {
  render(<MyComponent />);
  userEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button'));
  expect(screen.getByText(/updated text/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
});

Solution:

import { render, screen, act } from '@testing-library/react';
import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event';
import MyComponent from './MyComponent';

test('should update text on button click', () => {
  render(<MyComponent />);
  act(() => {
    userEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button'));
  });
  expect(screen.getByText(/updated text/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
});

2. Handle Asynchronous Updates

If the component uses asynchronous functions (like `setTimeout` or fetching data), wrap them in an async act() call.

Example:

import { render, screen, act } from '@testing-library/react';
import MyAsyncComponent from './MyAsyncComponent';

test('should fetch and display data', async () => {
  render(<MyAsyncComponent />);
  
  await act(async () => {
    await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000)); // Simulate async operation
  });

  expect(screen.getByText(/fetched data/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
});

3. Use Testing Library Utilities

React Testing Library provides utilities like `waitFor` that handle `act()` internally. This simplifies testing asynchronous code.

Example:

import { render, screen, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react';
import MyAsyncComponent from './MyAsyncComponent';

test('should fetch and display data', async () => {
  render(<MyAsyncComponent />);
  
  await waitFor(() => expect(screen.getByText(/fetched data/i)).toBeInTheDocument());
});

Common Pitfalls

1. Not Awaiting `act()`

Always await asynchronous calls inside act(). Forgetting this can lead to flaky tests.

2. Missing Dependencies

Ensure that all necessary dependencies, such as react-dom or @testing-library/react, are correctly installed and updated.

Debugging Tips

Inspect the Test Output: Check which state update or function call triggered the warning.
Log Suspicious Code: Temporarily add logs to narrow down the problematic part of the test.
Break Down Complex Tests: Simplify the test by isolating specific components or logic to pinpoint the issue.

Conclusion

The "not wrapped in act(...)" warning may seem intimidating at first, but it’s there to help ensure the reliability of your tests. By wrapping updates in act() and leveraging tools like waitFor, you can resolve this warning and write more predictable tests.

Got Questions?

If you have any tips or questions about this topic, feel free to share in the comments below. Let’s debug smarter, not harder!

Android App